Effective prompts are reusable building blocks that measurably increase quality, consistency, and speed. The following ten blueprint types cover 80–90% of common use cases—from ideation and analysis to output maturation. They help bring structure to creative processes and guide generative AI purposefully.
1. Role Focus: Set Perspective & Quality Standard
The desired perspective and the associated quality standards are made explicit, allowing the model to respond in a targeted manner. This results in more relevant, consistent outcomes that align with the professional standards of the chosen role.
- Template: “Act as a [Role/Expert]. Solve [Task] for [Target Group/Context] according to [Criteria].”
- Example: “Act as a startup mentor. Refine my SaaS idea for B2B SMEs based on customer value, monetization, and feasibility.”
- Pro-Tip: Add a “Definition of Done” (e.g., “3 clear assumptions + 1 risk + 1 next step”).
- Mistake to Avoid: Naming the role but forgetting the criteria—this leads to vague answers.
2. Step-by-Step: Reproducible Instructions
Complex projects are broken down into clearly structured, traceable steps. This enables reproducibility, reliable onboarding, and reduces typical execution errors.
- Template: “Explain how to achieve [Goal] in [n] clear steps. Include a checklist and common mistakes.”
- Example: “Explain in 5 steps how to create a landing page—with a final checklist and 3 typical mistakes.”
- Pro-Tip: Ask for a time/effort estimate per step—this improves planning.
- Mistake to Avoid: Only requesting steps without defining success criteria.
3. Compare & Decide: Options with Rationale
Options are evaluated according to transparent criteria, making trade-offs visible. The result is a reasoned recommendation that provides decision confidence.
- Template: “Compare [Option A] vs. [Option B] for [Goal] based on [Criteria List] and provide a clear recommendation with rationale.”
- Example: “Compare Notion vs. Trello for remote team management based on onboarding, collaboration, permissions, automation, cost—with a recommendation + Why.”
- Pro-Tip: Request a decision matrix (table with scores + short comment).
- Mistake to Avoid: Comparison without a concrete recommendation—no decision-making aid.
4. Idea Generator: Breadth First, Then Focus
Broad idea generation encourages variance, from which patterns, directions, and surprising approaches can be derived. This facilitates prioritization and sharpens the focus of experiments.
- Template: “Provide [Number] ideas for [Goal/Niche]. Vary [Tone/Channel/Target Audience] and label 1–2 moonshots.”
- Example: “Provide 12 Instagram post ideas for a fitness brand; mix how-to, story, UGC, challenges, and tag 2 moonshots.”
- Pro-Tip: Add a prioritization based on Impact/Feasibility (1–5).
- Mistake to Avoid: Only requesting ideas without sorting or evaluation criteria.
5. Style Rewriting: Consistency with Brand Voice
Content is consistently aligned with the brand’s tone, length, and language. This improves readability, brand fit, and adherence to formal requirements.
- Template: “Rewrite [Text] in the style of [Tone/Brand], [Length], with [Structure]; preserve [Content that must remain].”
- Example: “Rewrite this email to be friendly-professional, max 120 words, with a structure of Hook → Benefit → CTA, without jargon.”
- Pro-Tip: Provide negative constraints (“no superlatives, no emojis”) for clear style boundaries.
- Mistake to Avoid: Only saying “make it friendlier” without defining tonal guardrails.
6. Feedback & Optimization: Output Maturation
Targeted revisions increase the clarity, impact, and accuracy of the output. Reasoned changes create learning opportunities and a robust quality loop.
- Template: “Revise [Text/Code/Idea] focusing on [Goals: Clarity, Structure, Conversion, Accuracy]. Show changes and explain rationale.”
- Example: “Revise this cold email for a higher response rate. Mark deletions/additions and explain the reasoning.”
- Pro-Tip: Ask for an A/B variant and a risk check (facts, bias, compliance).
- Mistake to Avoid: Just saying “improve it” without defining the goal—this leads to cosmetic changes.
7. Scenario Simulation: Training & Anticipation
Realistic dialogues serve as a safe training environment for argumentation, objection handling, and decision-making. Teams anticipate critical situations and increase their responsiveness.
- Template: “Simulate [Scenario] between [Role A] and [Role B]. Include objections, counter-questions, and decision triggers.”
- Example: “Simulate a SaaS sales pitch (Founder ↔ Procurement). Include objections on price, security, integration—with best possible answers.”
- Pro-Tip: At the end, ask for „Lessons Learned“ and 3 next steps.
- Mistake to Avoid: Simple role-playing without defined takeaways loses the learning effect.
8. Format Specification: Publish-Ready Output
Results are generated directly in publish-ready formats, including structure, scope, and CTA. This saves production time and minimizes post-production work in editing and design.
- Template: “Create a [Format] on [Topic] with [Outline], [Length/Scope], [CTA], [Target Audience].”
- Example: “Create a LinkedIn carousel on content strategies with 10 slides (Hook, Problem, 3 Mistakes, 3 Tactics, Mini-Case, CTA).”
- Pro-Tip: Request variants (e.g., carousel + thread + short video script) for cross-posting.
- Mistake to Avoid: Just asking for “a carousel, please”—without structure and goal specification.
9. Checklist/List: Completeness & Control
Completeness and verifiability are ensured through clearly structured points. Risks decrease because „Fails to avoid“ and success criteria are made visible early.
- Template: “List the most important points for [X]. Group by [Thematic Blocks] and add ‘Fails to Avoid.’”
- Example: “List key factors for launching a digital product (Product-Market Fit, Pricing, Legal, Go-to-Market) + Top 3 mistakes.”
- Pro-Tip: Ask for a ‘Ready/Not Ready’ table with Yes/No checks.
- Mistake to Avoid: Flat lists without grouping or negative examples.
10. Pro/Con Brainstorm: Informing Decisions
Opposing arguments broaden the perspective and reduce decision bias. Evaluated Pro/Con points lead to a well-founded decision, including measures for risk mitigation.
- Template: “Brainstorm Pro & Con for [Topic]. Evaluate by Impact/Cost/Risk, propose a decision and risk mitigation.”
- Example: “Brainstorm Pro/Con for a freemium model, evaluate by growth, margin, support effort, and provide a decision recommendation.”
- Pro-Tip: Request a counterposition (“Devil’s Advocate”) for more robust decisions.
- Mistake to Avoid: Pro/Con without evaluation or conclusion remains superficial.
Conclusion
With these prompt blueprints, AI transforms from a mere answer-giver into a strategic work partner. What matters most is clarity over creativity, criteria over cosmetics, and DoD over Done. For your next use case, choose two to three of these templates, combine them into a small workflow—and measure the effect on impact, quality, and time savings.
„`
